June 1972 Home   Newsletters

October 1972

May 1973

Thoughts on Recycling... Design for Durability and Repairability
Program Making
Dollars and Sense: Who's on Welfare? We all are!
Have an hour you don't know what to do with?
Land Use Consensus Questions
Attitudes toward Property Rights (Carol Whitesell)
Constitutional Amendments
Voter Service
Suggestions for State Board Nominations
Solid Waste Consensus Questions

Thoughts on Recycling...
Design for Durability and Repairability

The Association of home Appliance Manufacturers says that Americans nor own some one billion appliances -- not counting radios and televisions -- double the figure ten years ago. Many of these products will be thrown away because some integral component -- difficult to locate or replace -- malfunctions. with standardization of parts, interchangeable modules, for washers, refrigerators, television sets, small appliances, even automobiles, their useful lives could be extended.

If manufacturers were required to provide a ten-year guarantee on a product, would they design it for longer use? Or if they were required to take back the worn-out product via the efficient distribution system that delivered the new product, would they try to make it last longer?

Would planning and working together on interchangeable parts or environmentally desirable products and processes put companies in violation of the anti-trust laws, as some say? If so, perhaps a limited suspension of anti-trust laws should be considered, where collective industrial effort affecting the environment is needed-- on standardization of packaging and container size, for example.

While these changes will cost us more in our role of consumer, it should lessen our tax outlay for solid waste disposal.

from LWV publication, Recycle?, 75 cents.

for more on Solid Waste and Recycling turn to page 6.

June 1972 Top   Home   Newsletters May 1973