Hawaii Island Kauai Maui
Home About Us
Join Us Contact Us LWV-U.S.
newsletters position papers legislature reports testimony links
 Position Papers - State

LWV-Hawaii Positions     LWV-Honolulu Positions     LWV-US Positions

League of Women Voters of Hawaii

Youth and Education

Natural Resources

Social Policy
Continuing Studies

Campaign Finance Reform
Citizen Rights
Constitutional Convention
Election Laws and Procedures
Hawaii Schools
Health Care
Initiative and Referendum
Judicial Independence
Juvenile Justice

Land Use
Legalized Gambling in Hawaii
Legislative Reform
Merit Selection of Judges
Midterm Legislative Vacancies
Multi-Family Residential Leasehold
School Board Primary Elections
Separation of Powers
Solid Waste
State Constitution
Violence Prevention

Merit Selection of Judges and Justices

Position in Brief

The League of Women Voters supports the merit selection of judges through a process which is as free of political influence as possible, encourages a fair representation of gender and Hawaii’s diversity of ethnic cultures, and discourages the domination of judges of one extreme ideology or another.


While our federal and state constitutions guarantees certain rights to all those accused of criminal wrongdoing, or who appear before civil courts to settle some dispute, these rights can only be recognized and preserved by a justice system which is impartial and fair, free of political influence or pressure and intimidation by outside groups.

The League believes that the merit selection of judges is the best system to achieve that end. Such a system should:

  1. Include an independent, nonpartisan commission which does the initial screening of applicants for a judgeship with
    1. commissioners appointed by more than one or two appointing authorities to ensure diversity of experiences and viewpoints,
    2. terms long enough for commissioners to acquire the knowledge and develop those skills necessary to meet their responsibilities yet not too long for cronyism to set in,
    3. staggered terms to preserve the institutional memory necessary for the application of lessons learned and for the experienced members to help in the orientation of the newer commissioners,
    4. the release of names of nominees for appointment by the appointing authority at the same time that the names are sent to the appointing authority, in order to incorporate transparency into the system,

  2. Provide clear criteria for the evaluation of candidates, and

  3. Include accountability built into the system through:
    1. access to appellate review of judgements on cases by plaintives and defendants,
    2. periodic performance reviews of judges and justices by an independent body,
    3. careful reviews of performance records and solicitations of public comments prior to decisions on retention for additional terms by the body charged with the responsibility, and
    4. the establishment of a judicial conduct committee or commission to investigate charges of misconduct in office, unethical behavior, and willful neglect of the responsibilities of office.

Adopted November 15, 2003


Search WWW Search this site

Home | About Us | Join Us | Contact Us | LWV-US
newsletters | position papers | legislature | reports | testimony | links